African vs. Jungu Diabz ...

Objective:
To compare the posterior accentuation between African and Jungu Mamaz

Sample Size:
jungu = 30 mamaz
african = 30 mamaz

Null Hypothesis:
There is no difference in accentuation between an African diabz and a jungu diabz

Alternative Hypothesis:
An African diabz is more accentuated than a jungu diabz … [ click to see Exihibit "A"]

Accentuation Test:
The challenge here was to develop a subtle, fair and scientifically measurable test.
That was achieved by computing the “wobbling effect” in a random sample of mamaz.
We assume vector quantities, not scalar. That is, the closer to ZERO the “wobble magnitude” is, the more accentuated the diabz is.

The “wobble magnitude” is obtained by observing the number of sideway swings made by a diabz, without bobbling up and down. This means that a “perfect wobble” has a magnitude of exactly ZERO, that is, if observed for a minute, the diabz will sweep equidistant “left-right” arcs with minimal “up-down” disturbances …

RESULTS:
The null hypothesis was rejected at all levels of significance. The African mamaz win, hands down. The key question is HOW?

EXPLANATION:
Two raus of grey-goose* –pineapple, and off I was, traversing the ethers to the Galapagos … whither my answer was revealed. That will be the object of my next post entitled:

“How African Mamaz Have Bigger Diabz than Jungus – An Evolutionary Approach”


Motive:
Why would someone do such an experiment? Well ... very good question ... but sometimes why is less important than how! Let me demonstrate ...

Tell me:

How would a goose* (a real goose) look in high-heels and shades?